Truth Social post

Original

2024-10-03 17:51:14 GMT-4
2024-10-03T21:51:14.141Z · UTC

Gregg Jarrett: “Releasing this motion, this court filing, it sure looks like blatant Election Interference…There's no good reason to make it public. It's premature. There isn't even a trial date. So, I think this was done knowing full well Media and Democrats would seize on ‘provocative’ details, publicize it, to affect voters…At times it reads like bad detective fiction. A lot of it is irrelevant and inadmissible conversations that other people have that are not connected to Trump directly. So, it seems like deliberate Election Interference…The problem for Smith is a lot of his evidence and testimony comes from Public Officials, and their conversations with Trump, including the Vice President. Under the Supreme Court Decision that may well be protected information, and thus inadmissible.”