TRUMPSAYS.

Latest posts

Newest first · Native reposts excluded · Partial coverage

  1. 13,903 likes

    Gregg Jarrett: “We’re entering the Fourth Week, and there’s still NO EVIDENCE connecting Trump with any criminal wrongdoing…A crime that’s not charged, and a crime in which prosecutors won’t even tell the defendants what it is, it’s a mystery crime. That is such an egregious violation of the Sixth Amendment. This Judge is so biased…This case should take about five minutes for an acquittal.”

    View post →

    Captured source text.

  2. 12,800 likes

    Jonathan Turley: “After Bragg closes the prosecution’s case, the defense will make a standard motion for dismissal. Merchan should grant that motion. There has been no showing of an actual crime…Merchan has failed to protect the rights of the defendant from a baseless, politically motivated prosecution.”

    View post →

    Captured source text.

  3. 12,014 likes

    Andrew C. McCarthy: “TRUMP SHOULD BE ACQUITTED IN MANHATTAN: Wholly independent of the plethora of Constitutional infirmities in the prosecution, it should be thrown out for the most basic of reasons: Bragg can’t prove his case.”

    View post →

    Captured source text.

  4. 11,223 likes

    Mark Levin: “Our Judicial System has blown up!”

    View post →

    Captured source text.

  5. 11,294 likes

    Fareed Zakaria, CNN: “I doubt the New York Indictment would have been brought against a defendant whose name was not Donald Trump.”

    View post →

    Captured source text.

  6. 11,594 likes

    Fox News should let Judge Jeanine cover the Trial, not Eric Shawn, who has no clue what’s going on - Just another RINO.

    View post →

    Captured source text.

  7. 19,899 likes

    Virtually every Legal Analyst and Scholar said yesterday, at the end of the day, THAT THERE IS NO CASE, AND THAT THIS WITCH HUNT SHOULD HAVE NEVER BEEN BROUGHT, AND SHOULD BE THROWN OUT NOW!!! WHY WASN’T THIS HOAX BROUGHT SEVEN YEARS AGO, INSTEAD OF IN THE MIDDLE OF MY WINNING CAMPAIGN FOR PRESIDENT — ELECTION INTERFERENCE. The problem is that this Judge, Merchan, is TOTALLY COMPROMISED, CONFLICTED, AND CORRUPT, MAKING BIG MONEY OFF OF THIS SCAM AND ITS OUTCOME. He can’t render a fair decision, too much is at stake for him and the Democrats. The Appellate Division should remove him immediately!

    View post →

    Captured source text.

  8. 18,778 likes

    [Image]

    View post →

    Captured source text.

  9. 15,371 likes

    [Image]

    View post →

    Captured source text.

  10. 14,725 likes

    [Image]

    View post →

    Captured source text.

  11. 13,614 likes

    [Image]

    View post →

    Captured source text.

  12. 13,316 likes

    [Image]

    View post →

    Captured source text.

  13. 13,139 likes

    [Image]

    View post →

    Captured source text.

  14. 15,767 likes

    MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!

    View post →

    Captured source text.

  15. 14,848 likes

    Senator Tim Scott: “Objective is to keep Trump off the Campaign trail…[It’s a] two-tiered Justice System, Sham, and not a Courtroom - This is a stage to find Trump guilty in eyes of public – Shameful!”

    View post →

    Captured source text.

  16. 13,698 likes

    Jonathan Turley: “Can't imagine any competent lawyer would not be embarrassed by what has happened in this Courtroom…This day is truly going to go down as a day of infamy for the New York Legal System. Watching this unfold in that Courtroom as a lawyer is really deeply disturbing…They keep on referring to these documents. The documents don’t move the ball. The documents show an NDA and a payment that’s not in dispute. They are not unlawful. They are not unlawful as a Federal Campaign Contribution.”

    View post →

    Captured source text.

  17. 12,943 likes

    Andy McCarthy: “Bragg knows what he is doing is improper, completely political case. Maybe Merchan is having second thoughts…They haven't come close to proving that fraud has taken place, and they don't just have to prove that fraud has taken place, they have to prove that it was fraud that included a specific intent to commit another crime, ‘which we believe is a Federal Campaign Finance Crime’…But there's not a scintilla of evidence that Trump was even thinking about Federal Campaign Law.”

    View post →

    Captured source text.

  18. 12,020 likes

    Matt Whitaker: “Another day of trial, and nowhere close to allegations or evidence of illegality.”

    View post →

    Captured source text.

  19. 12,428 likes

    Marc Thiessen: “I don't think things are going well for the prosecution in the Court of Law, but in the Court of Public Opinion, they're doing even worse...Trump is rising in the Polls!”

    View post →

    Captured source text.

  20. 12,126 likes

    Mark Levin: "A fraudulent intent is required to prove a crime. But a fraudulent intent to commit what crime? If Bragg cannot articulate the crime or won’t, how can Trump have had a criminal intent to commit it, whatever it is? This is Alice in Wonderland and 1984 combined! Let me put it as succinctly as possible: There’s no crime, State or Federal, with which to link Donald Trump...This is a case looking for a Legal basis. THERE IS NONE!"

    View post →

    Captured source text.