TRUMPSAYS.

Latest posts

Newest first · Native reposts excluded · Partial coverage

  1. 8,901 likes

    Leo Terrell: “This is not a courtroom…It is not legal. I’ve been in court for 30 plus years and what is happening in New York, the Democrats, they have hijacked the legal system, and it is outright embarrassing to lawyers.”

    View post →

    Captured source text.

  2. 7,581 likes

    David Gelman, Fox Business: “Alvin Bragg didn’t want to try this case. The only reason he did it is because former D.A.’s in his Office went and wrote a book pretty much saying, ‘Hey Alvin, you should do this because it’s political’…Nothing has been proven here. That’s why I keep [saying] there should be a directed verdict, meaning the Judge should take it out of the jury’s hands, and say, ‘Prosecution, you did not meet your burden, you did not find that there is a crime here. Donald Trump, go home, go campaign.’”

    View post →

    Captured source text.

  3. 7,423 likes

    Gregg Jarrett: “There is no credible evidence that Trump engineered or even knew about booking entries by accountants that were not false at all. Nor is there any plausible evidence that he willfully violated campaign laws that were not violations at all. Where is the fraud that prosecutors argued in their opening statement? Like Bigfoot, it’s a fictitious missing link in the case. This has always been a trial in search of an imaginary crime and a disgraceful charade. This case has reasonable doubt written all over it.”

    View post →

    Captured source text.

  4. 7,641 likes

    Bill O’Reilly: “There is zero evidence he even thought about campaign funding statutes. Repeat. Zero evidence. In order to convict, there has to be ‘criminal intent,’ as the nation saw with the Hillary Clinton private email thing. So, simple man that I am, I can't see a conviction.”

    View post →

    Captured source text.

  5. 6,799 likes

    Caroline Polisi, CBS Mornings: “Trump himself didn’t go on the drop down menu and say these were reimbursements or retainer fee.”

    View post →

    Captured source text.

  6. 7,490 likes

    Mike Davis: “When CNN’s Jake Tapper is even admitting that the prosecution has failed to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt, you know it's a bad day for the prosecution.”

    View post →

    Captured source text.

  7. 6,724 likes

    Mark O'Mara, CNN Legal Analyst: “Four hour closing argument is way too long ... Making it more complicated, there’s reasonable doubt."

    View post →

    Captured source text.

  8. 6,602 likes

    Trial Attorney Randy Zelin, CNN: “There is reasonable doubt all over this case.”

    View post →

    Captured source text.

  9. 6,711 likes

    Byron York: “Prosecutors did not prove that Trump, intending to defraud, caused false company records to be made, starting in Feb 2017. They never proved that he did it or told anybody to do it. And if they did not prove that, it’s over.”

    View post →

    Captured source text.

  10. 6,607 likes

    Andrew Cherkasky: “When you can't explain the crime, sometimes that's the evidence of innocence in and of its own right - When you charge them with something, and then you're waiting, and you're waiting, and you never get to it. That's the idea that the person was innocent all along.”

    View post →

    Captured source text.

  11. 11,604 likes

    Pam Bondi: "He committed no crime...There is nothing there."

    View post →

    Captured source text.

  12. 11,052 likes

    Gregg Jarrett: "The element of the alleged crimes were never proven in this Case - Business Records were not false, they were accurate. Trump had no involvement, there's no evidence he willfully violated Election Laws, and no Laws were even broken. Plus, it's factually impossible to influence an Election after it's over, yet that's how the Indictment reads...Where is the crime? It's nowhere! This is what I call a Bigfoot Case. It's a Trial in search of an imaginary crime."

    View post →

    Captured source text.

  13. 10,347 likes

    Gregg Jarrett: "This Case against Donald Trump is Election Interference and Brazen Lawfare."

    View post →

    Captured source text.

  14. 9,754 likes

    Pete Hegseth: "The Prosecution's case is a disaster!"

    View post →

    Captured source text.

  15. 9,489 likes

    NDA’s ARE TOTALLY LEGAL AND ACCEPTED!

    View post →

    Captured source text.

  16. 8,598 likes

    DEFENSE OF COUNSEL DEFENSE!

    View post →

    Captured source text.

  17. 10,802 likes

    Gregg Jarrett: “They manipulated the justice system to create this illusion of wrongdoing…”

    View post →

    Captured source text.

  18. 10,914 likes

    THE D.A.’s OFFICE WAS ALLOWED TO GO ON WITH 5 HOURS OF BULL…. YESTERDAY. I have no rights against this Crooked Judge’s Gag Order!

    View post →

    Captured source text.

  19. 9,433 likes

    “THEY DON’T HAVE A CRIME AND THEY KNOW IT..”

    View post →

    Captured source text.

  20. 24,742 likes

    KANGAROO COURT! A CORRUPT AND CONFLICTED JUDGE. RELIANCE ON COUNSEL (ADVISE OF COUNSEL) NOT ALLOWED BY MERCHAN, A FIRST. HIS RULINGS, ON A CASE THAT SHOULD, ACCORDING TO ALL LEGAL SCHOLARS AND EXPERTS, NEVER HAVE BEEN BROUGHT, HAVE MADE THIS A BIDEN PUSHED WITCH HUNT. THERE WAS NO CRIME, EXCEPT FOR THE BUM THAT GOT CAUGHT STEALING FROM ME! IN GOD WE TRUST!

    View post →

    Captured source text.