Latest posts
Newest first · Native reposts excluded · Partial coverage
Testimony conclusively showed that I clearly stated, “I DON’T BUY STORIES!” — Not that there would be anything wrong with doing that — NDA’s are PERFECTLY LEGAL AND COMMON!
View post →Captured source text.
Can anybody believe that our Government would be spending Tens of Millions of Taxpayer Dollars on prosecuting this RIDICULOUS Case? I DID NOTHING WRONG! IN FACT, I DID EVERYTHING RIGHT. The testimony in Court was amazing for the Defense!
View post →Captured source text.
“Nobody hates blue-collar, hardworking middle-class Americans more than the Democrat Party. Robert DeNiro is the epitome of that...He's not just attacking Trump, he's attacking the lifeblood of this country—the people who make things happen…” Donald Trump Jr.
View post →Captured source text.
Senator Marsha Blackburn: “This is the WEAPONIZATION of our JUDICIAL SYSTEM. This is why so many of my friends who are Democrats and Independents are saying they are voting for Trump. They've never voted for him before—but they know if they can do this to a former President, they can do it to you.”
View post →Captured source text.
Chairman Michael Whatley: “First they tried to get the President off the ballot, now they’re trying to get him off the campaign trail, and they’re trying to WEAPONIZE the JUDICIARY to win this election—and it’s just not going to work!”
View post →Captured source text.
ELECTION INTERFERENCE!!!
View post →Captured source text.
Everyone's against this case. I haven't seen one legal scholar say that this case should've been filed. It's 7-years-old, everybody turned it down…Federal Elections turned it down, the Southern District turned it down—Bragg turned it down, then he rejuvenated it when I was running for office—at the request of Crooked Joe Biden.
View post →Captured source text.
This is a very sad day for AMERICA, and NEW YORK—The whole WORLD is watching...it’s all RIGGED, the whole system is RIGGED…
View post →Captured source text.
Gregg Jarrett: “Unanimous jury decisions are a bedrock constitutional principle derived from the Sixth and Seventh Amendments. That requirement extends to all key issues, including every necessary element of an alleged crime and/or the establishment of secondary crimes. This is an indispensable feature of jury trials. It’s what defines our rule of law and makes America’s system of justice the envy of the world. But in the trial of Donald Trump, jurors can agree to disagree while still reaching the ultimate verdict in unanimity. Only in an ‘Alice in Wonderland’ case with a Mad Hatter judge could the cherished principles of fairness be turned upside down.”
View post →Captured source text.
Gregg Jarrett: “I dare say that in the history of American jurisprudence, never has a defendant been tried on an unidentified charge. No ethical prosecutor would ever do it. No fair or competent judge would ever allow it because every defendant has a right to be informed of the precise accusations against him. It is guaranteed in the Bill of Rights and rigorously guarded…The U.S. Supreme Court has held that unanimity in jury verdicts is required under the Sixth and Seventh Amendments. That requirement extends to all issues, said the high court. To find someone guilty, jurors must always agree —without dissent— on every necessary element of the purported crime. This is an indispensable feature of jury trials. Yet, it has inexplicably vanished in this case. District Attorney Alvin Bragg has…
View post →Captured source text. Preview shortened to 800 characters. Open the post for the complete captured text.
Gregg Jarrett: “The Sixth Amendment requires prosecutors to inform every defendant ‘of the nature and cause of the accusations’ against them. The deliberate refusal by the prosecution to do so in this case is an egregious violation of a hallowed constitutional right. Only in closing arguments —after the trial testimony concluded and all of the evidence was presented— did the prosecutor finally reveal the enigma: it was a federal election crime. But wait. He then contradicted himself by claiming that it was a state crime. Which is it? As a matter of law, neither. It can not be the former because a local prosecutor has no authority to enforce a federal law. And it can not be the latter, because it was a federal election, not a state contest. State law has no application.”
View post →Captured source text.
Gregg Jarrett: “The booking entries occurred in 2017, the year after the presidential contest ended. It’s factually impossible to influence an election when it is over. Regardless, there was no credible evidence that Trump had anything to do with the accounting methods or even knew about them. Why would he? He was the CEO, not the bookkeeper…Who exactly was defrauded? Voters who had already voted? The government which received full payment on all taxable income? The Federal Election Commission (FEC) that concluded the money paid did not constitute a campaign donation under law? Prosecutors never actually disclosed the lynchpin of their case during the trial because they could not. There was no fraud and no conspiracy. It is that simple. Moreover, without a primary crime, there can be no s…
View post →Captured source text. Preview shortened to 800 characters. Open the post for the complete captured text.
Judge Jeanine: “This is a Kangaroo Court…”
View post →Captured source text.
Even the losers at MBDNC admit that this is a bad case, a case that should not have been brought.
View post →Captured source text.
“LAWFARE!!!”
View post →Captured source text.
ELECTION INTERFERENCE!!!
View post →Captured source text.
Thank you! https://www. foxbusiness.com/video/63539382 26112
View post →Captured source text.
GOOD MORNING, MONTANA…
View post →Captured source text.
https://www. DonaldJTrump.com/joi
View post →Captured source text.
Stephen Miller: “Even though it is Donald Trump on trial, it is Joe Biden & the Democrat Communist prosecutors who are facing the judgment of history—and who will incur the wrath of the American voter.”
View post →Captured source text.