Latest posts · Page 2345

@daferna2 @AndrewYang Probably something notable to announce in a few months

@AndrewYang I hope a cybernetic interface is ready in time. Symbiosis, irrelevance (hopefully blissful) or doom seem to be the three most likely paths.

@rdstrick777 @jeff_foust Actually true

@techreview 😲 https://t.co/64KuOQkXeO

@techreview Found a pic https://t.co/sVohudrKQK

@CdeCiencia First flight for Falcon Heavy Block 5 means there is some risk of failure between 5% to 10% imo. Many good design improvements from Falcon Heavy demo, but the changes are unproven.

I first read this as making wind with 🧀

@mcannonbrookes @DigitalMedia_LM Norway has already proven it could be done last month. No question Australia could do this in far fewer than 11 years.

@techreview .@JeffBezos copy 🐈

@bonnienorman @vincent13031925 @Tesla No, it’s better

@vincent13031925 @Tesla Building primary structure completion seems on track for May, but then it will take several months to install & activate factory equipment

@MrTimDunn Love Brunel. Great first name too.

@GaryMil61532928 @techreview Yes

@MRBLift @annerajb @PeteSauerbier ~80%

@annerajb @PeteSauerbier Mobile can do it no problem

@PeteSauerbier Doesn’t matter yet whether you have Tesla FSD computer or Tesla Nvidia-based computer. When it does matter later this year, Tesla will switch the computers for you.

@eliabbott What city?

@olastensson Two, independent system-on-chip architecture, with each SoC having two NN accelerators that can perform simultaneous health-check calculations to protect against a soft error

@obikela @ceo_plus_ch @Tesla Yes. Working through regulatory approvals.

The Tesla Full Self-Driving Computer now in production is at about 5% compute load for these tasks or 10% with full fail-over redundancy