Latest posts · Page 2319
@Everman @AndyKiersz I paid most of my Tesla-related expenses too. Tesla last year was actually net negative comp for me.
View post →Captured source text.
@dealer_of_happy @Tesla One day’s grace, taking into account time zone confusion. Will revert tomorrow.
View post →Captured source text.
@nichegamer Edgy move
View post →Captured source text.
@SPEXcast @WentaiW @1DarknessSoul5 @SpaceX Good idea
View post →Captured source text.
@WentaiW @1DarknessSoul5 @SpaceX True. I’m a gamer & my boys are too. Starlink is designed to be great even for competitive twitch reflex games.
View post →Captured source text.
@cleantechnica Yup
View post →Captured source text.
@fcain @varunversion1 @Erdayastronaut @SpaceX Would love to do exactly that
View post →Captured source text.
@Cosmic_Penguin Agreed, sent a note to Starlink team last week specifically regarding albedo reduction. We’ll get a better sense of value of this when satellites have raised orbits & arrays are tracking to sun.
View post →Captured source text.
@fcain @varunversion1 @Erdayastronaut @SpaceX Exactly, potentially helping billions of economically disadvantaged people is the greater good. That said, we’ll make sure Starlink has no material effect on discoveries in astronomy. We care a great deal about science.
View post →Captured source text.
@John_Gardi @13ericralph31 @varunversion1 @Erdayastronaut @SpaceX Rotate on one axis. Magnetic torque rods for desaturation of momentum wheels.
View post →Captured source text.
@GoForStaging @13ericralph31 @varunversion1 @Erdayastronaut @SpaceX Yes, already planned. We avoid use of certain lower Ku frequencies specifically for radio astronomy.
View post →Captured source text.
@1DarknessSoul5 @SpaceX Aiming for sub 20ms latency initially, sub 10ms over time, with much greater consistency than terrestrial links, as only ever a few hops to major data centers
View post →Captured source text.
@13ericralph31 @varunversion1 @Erdayastronaut @SpaceX If we need to tweak sat orientation to minimize solar reflection during critical astronomical experiments, that’s easily done. Most orbital objects are close to Earth btw, as shown by this NASA density map. https://t.co/83MwIZAEP6 https://t.co/NllMXregRg
View post →Captured source text.
@varunversion1 @Erdayastronaut @SpaceX There are already 4900 satellites in orbit, which people notice ~0% of the time. Starlink won’t be seen by anyone unless looking very carefully & will have ~0% impact on advancements in astronomy. We need to move telelscopes to orbit anyway. Atmospheric attenuation is terrible. https://t.co/OuWYfNmw0D
View post →Captured source text.
@Erdayastronaut @SpaceX No, Raptor uses a large number of coaxial swirl injectors, which (we believe) achieves highest theoretical mixing/combustion efficiency.
View post →Captured source text.
@meme0boi Fair
View post →Captured source text.
@Erdayastronaut @SpaceX Super proud of SpaceX propulsion/test/materials team! One of hardest technology problems. New high temp superalloy & internal foundry needed to make it work. Foundry iteration interval is ~3 weeks from design to flight part vs ~36 weeks typical for aerospace.
View post →Captured source text.
@DJSnM Only a tiny amount. There is enough air to affect the satellites & allow some amount of yaw steering.
View post →Captured source text.
@SPEXcast @Erdayastronaut @SpaceX Propellant stays same, but almost everything else improves. Fundamental goal is minimize cost per ton to surface of Mars.
View post →Captured source text.
@Erdayastronaut @SpaceX Great video. Couple notes: Raptor designed for subcooled CH4/O2, so propellant density & thrust increase up to ~8%, as needed for mission. 380 Isp & up to 50% thrust/weight improvement over time. Merlin thrust/weight doubled from V1, but Raptor is closer to optimum.
View post →Captured source text.