Latest posts · Page 1963

@TeslaGong @BryceSpaceTech Yes No, but it will get refilled & maybe cargo transfer

@enn_nafnlaus @BryceSpaceTech Making life multiplanetary is an extremely hard, but not impossible, problem

@BryceSpaceTech Still basically nothing compared to the orbital mass flux needed for a base on moon or Mars

@kittynouveau Probably will trap a Tesla with the production Autopilot build, but won’t work with FSD. Using a ring of cones would stop FSD though.

@NevanRead @A11electric It will be there

@vincent13031925 This engine needs to be 10X lower cost. Order of magnitude change is good reason for a new name. What really matters is not yet another “advanced” rocket engine, as there are many such devices, but there has never been a cheap (<$1000/Ton-force) rocket engine. Not even close

@slashdot Sigh

@SamTwits @Erdayastronaut @PPathole @vincent13031925 Long chain hydrocarbons, like kerosene, have excellent volumetric energy density, but what you really want for rockets is best way to bind hydrogen, which is CH4. Also, easy to make & store CH4+O2 from CO2+H2O, which are abundant on Mars.

@SpaceX ♥️ 🌍 🌎 🌏 ♥️

@Erdayastronaut @PPathole @vincent13031925 Fully reusable rockets want high T/W to minimize $/ton to orbit, because propellant cost actually matters

@WholeMarsBlog Automatically drive to most obvious location unless occupant says otherwise

@WatchersTank @SpaceX With that, Ship is basically begging for an extra 3 engines

@WatchersTank @SpaceX 33

@Aristot21520213 @ray4tesla Exactly

@ignaciobelieres @oza_shiv @lrocket “Ignition!”

@oza_shiv @lrocket Throw in some hydrogen & lithium for a real party

@oza_shiv @lrocket 🔥

@lrocket What propellant?

Moving at ~23 times speed of sound, circling Earth every ~90 minutes

@hiromichimizuno Ironically, yes at this time. FSD beta system at times can seem so good that vigilance isn’t necessary, but it is. Also, any beta user who isn’t super careful will get booted. 2000 beta users operating for almost a year with no accidents. Needs to stay that way.