2022-05-14
18 indexed posts · All posts for this date, newest first.
The Lawyers Who Ate California https://t.co/i4PCxc5RBH
View post →Captured source text.
@nichegamer Just another day in Elden Ring!
View post →Captured source text.
@PPathole @Twitter Twitter legal just called to complain that I violated their NDA by revealing the bot check sample size is 100! This actually happened.
View post →Captured source text.
(This message brought to you by the Illuminaughty)
View post →Captured source text.
Very important to fix your Twitter feed: 1. Tap home button. 2. Tap stars on upper right of screen. 3. Select “Latest tweets”. You are being manipulated by the algorithm in ways you don’t realize. Easy to switch back & forth to see the difference.
View post →Captured source text.
@TimRunsHisMouth 🤣🎯
View post →Captured source text.
@DBurkland Team is working the weekend to get 10.12 in limited release tomorrow. Then we evaluate, do a point update, and broaden the release. 10.12.2 is probably where we can expand to a safety score of 95+.
View post →Captured source text.
At least, that’s what the lib hivemind thinks haha
View post →Captured source text.
Whoever thought owning the libs would be cheap never tried to acquire a social media company!
View post →Captured source text.
The bots are angry at being counted 🤣
View post →Captured source text.
@PPathole @Twitter Any sensible random sampling process is fine. If many people independently get similar results for % of fake/spam/duplicate accounts, that will be telling. I picked 100 as the sample size number, because that is what Twitter uses to calculate <5% fake/spam/duplicate.
View post →Captured source text.
@fintwit_news @Twitter I relied upon the accuracy of Twitter’s public filings
View post →Captured source text.
@stevenmarkryan @teslaownersSV @Twitter Interesting
View post →Captured source text.
@teslaownersSV @Twitter If we collectively try to figure out the bot/duplicate user percentage, we can probably crowdsource a good answer
View post →Captured source text.
@teslaownersSV @Twitter Ignore first 1000 followers, then pick every 10th. I’m open to better ideas.
View post →Captured source text.
@coffeetabletsla @Twitter Pick any account with a lot of followers
View post →Captured source text.
To find out, my team will do a random sample of 100 followers of @twitter. I invite others to repeat the same process and see what they discover …
View post →Partial source text; the original may contain more.
@BillyM2k The axiomatic error was that housing prices only go up. I don’t support predatory lending, but many of those lenders were severely wounded or didn’t survive. They dug their own graves – a lesson we should all take to heart, including me.
View post →Captured source text.