2021-08-18
11 indexed posts · All posts for this date, newest first.
@Erdayastronaut @Caspar_Stanley No, bottom static aero pushes engine section back, counteracting Starship’s low center of mass on reentry caused by the engine section. Aiming for 60 to 70 deg angle of attack during high heating portion of flight. Don’t want to reenter with engines blasted by plasma.
View post →Captured source text.
@zone_astronomy Low center of mass. Bit like our ship & booster on reentry.
View post →Captured source text.
@GerberKawasaki Same
View post →Captured source text.
@adamhoov 🤣🤣
View post →Captured source text.
@engineers_feed 🤣
View post →Captured source text.
@Erdayastronaut @Caspar_Stanley Probably slightly further forward, smaller, more inward. No funny looking static aero at top, as static aero no longer directly in flow.
View post →Captured source text.
@Erdayastronaut Btw, there’s a slight error with forward flap design. Moving section is needed for control, but passive section is counter-productive, as it pushes nose backwards. New design rotates fwd flaps more to leeward & further forward to improve moment arm. Maybe ~120 deg apart.
View post →Captured source text.
@AmyAcker @lisajoynolan @Reminiscence Product ideas!
View post →Captured source text.
@CodingMark @Tesla True
View post →Captured source text.
@Delta_IV_Heavy You can make anything fly haha
View post →Captured source text.
@Kristennetten @MartinViecha Yes
View post →Captured source text.