2019-03-09
9 indexed posts · All posts for this date, newest first.
@Drew78823936 @Erdayastronaut @DJSnM @RocketTenor @NASA @SpaceX @Space_Station @Commercial_Crew Probably right. Starship rate of progress far exceeds Falcon & Dragon, although they’re critical to getting there. dInnovation/dt is what matters long-term.
View post →Captured source text.
@DJSnM @RocketTenor @NASA @SpaceX @Space_Station @Commercial_Crew For cargo missions, propulsive land landing should be no problem. Doesn’t have same safety criticality as crew.
View post →Captured source text.
@dmk184 @NASA @SpaceX @Space_Station @Commercial_Crew Pretty much any moon or planet that has a solid or liquid surface
View post →Captured source text.
@iamkostmos @NASA @SpaceX @Space_Station @Commercial_Crew Most likely, but this is contingent upon NASA review & approval
View post →Captured source text.
@xandriteme @NASA @SpaceX @Space_Station @Commercial_Crew Best to use a giant brake pad, aka heat shield
View post →Captured source text.
@ajithshan03 @NASA @SpaceX @Space_Station @Commercial_Crew No
View post →Captured source text.
@NASA @SpaceX @Space_Station @Commercial_Crew Dragon 2 was designed to land using thrusters, with parachutes as backup. Switched to chutes as primary, due to difficulty of proving safety, but Dragon can still do it. https://t.co/Mr7VFIQwWf
View post →Captured source text.
@TheOnion https://t.co/JoBxDo3zwh
View post →Captured source text.
@MKBHD @Tesla 😉
View post →Captured source text.